Which Came First – The Christian or the Keg?

For the purpose of this blog, a Christian is one who takes seriously his faith and the moral standards articulated in the new covenant. The keg represents both the excesses which account for much sin (as in drinking is ok but being drunk is not) as well as crossing the clearly articulated moral lines which are drawn in numerous places in the Gospel message.

At this point I want to make it clear that this blog is for Christians and not the general public. I totally agree with a good friend, Ashley, who on Facebook this week pointed out that Christians “need to get our act together”. This blog is pointing the finger at us not the un-churched.

I am regularly amazed at the gymnastics I can go through to try and justify my particular temptation to sin. But ultimately I can never escape the black and white in scripture which addresses anger or lust. But then that is what all we Christians do. Moral relativism is what all of us tend to practice as Christians. We do it by explaining away our particular vice/sin with various excuses. We justify Christian divorce and remarriage by saying compationate sounding things like “surly a loving God wouldn’t expect him/her to remain single” but of course we can’t cite chapter and verse to support that view. We might explain our heavily focused effort to earn lots of money as a means to support the work of the Gospel and whereas that sounds so sacrificially spiritual we can again cite no scripture to support that philosophy.

With the keg representing excess, we might, for example, talk too much “out of concern” for a brother or sister, but of course never calling it gossip. One the money issue, the excess focus on riches would rarely be called out as greed as it is in scripture. Nor would I easily admit to gluttony for my excessive love of food and the unhealthy weight it brings to my heart and waist line.

I’m sure it was easier for my wife and me to kick our son out of the house for lying and dealing illegal drugs than it would have been if he had come to us telling us he was gay. Aren’t we supposed to be understanding and compassionate in those circumstances? While visiting with some good friends, they asked Barbie and me our advice on being understanding towards their son who expressed that he was gay. We asked if they would want to be understanding if he had just informed them he had chosen to be a murderer or thief. I remember one of my kid’s best Christian friends as having a strong and absolute conviction against sex before marriage right up until they had sex before marriage. All of a sudden sex outside of marriage was OK.

In Roman’s 1:26-32 there is quite an extensive list of sins for which the consequence indicated for those who practice them is death – in context, I did not get the impression the author was talking about natural death. Here is the list: male & female homosexuality, greed, depravity, envy (can you say keeping up with the Jones’?), murder, strife, deceit, malice, gossips (seriously?), slanderers, God-haters, insolent, arrogant, boastful and disobedient to their parents (no way!) The last thing on the list is really shocking as it includes those who sit on the “sidelines” in approval of those who practice the things in the list above.

My wife was visiting with a good friend this week who has basically redacted several specific scriptures in order to not have to deal with activities practiced by a couple of her children. This wonderful Christian woman would have been a huge proponent of holiness in all areas of one’s life right up to the point she had to start dealing with the lack thereof in a specific area with her own family. And thus starts the keg “party” of drowning our convictions in a foggy morass called “if it feels good – do it” because surly a loving God wouldn’t deny us …..(fill in the blank).

The new covenant in scripture is not a book of suggestions to be massaged and reformed to meet any decline in moral activity. Being a true Christian is not relative and neither does it immediately translate into perfection (as much as we might give that impression to the un-churched). The church needs to get its own house in order and keep our focus on Jesus and on His unchanging standards of holiness. In doing so, I believe the light of the full Gospel will attract those outside the church who are desperately looking for sincerity and consistency instead of milquetoast relativism and the constantly moving target of what it means to be a Christian.


5 thoughts on “Which Came First – The Christian or the Keg?

  1. Morgan Guyton says:

    Thanks for sharing this blog with me. In terms of deciding whether to kick out your kids or not, I do think there’s a difference between someone doing something that’s criminal and creating security issues in your home versus someone who is simply in a state of sin. Otherwise, there would be a lot of overweight homeless kids whose parents kicked them out for gluttony.

    • jmobeox6 says:

      First of all, let’s assume the “children” are of “legal age”. I understand feeling conflicted in how to respond to say gossip, gluttony or homosexuality on one side and on the other side illegal activity such as dealing illegal drugs (or lying about them), murder or robery. Of course it “sounds” just and balanced to look differently at these differently, but can we really cite chapter & verse as to dealing with these “different” catagories of sin … differently (among Christians). Maybe there is scriptural justification for dealing differently with some of those sins in that list, I am not aware of any, but feel free to offer you scripturally based justification for a different approach. I’m am well aware I am asking a tough and challenging question as to what it means to be silent or stand in approval of activity that is so prevelant in the church.

      • Morgan Guyton says:

        First of all, let’s assume the “children” are of “legal age”. Okay, I gotcha. I was picturing something different. Peter does say, “Love covers a multitude of sins.” What do you suppose that means? There’s also a verse about the duty of reproofing your brother. John Wesley preached a sermon on it. My experience as a pastor has been that few people allow me to get to know them well enough that I can exhort them about their personal lives more than simply preaching the word from the pulpit. The ones who have opened up to me have been such a gift. I try to be gentle and honest at the same time, best I can.

  2. Seth Tucker says:

    I think this is an accurate observation, especially in the Bible belt. I think the rather difficult passage in James 2 is applicable here:

    “Do you want to be shown, you foolish person, that faith apart from works is useless? Was not Abraham our father justified by works when he offered up his son Isaac on the altar? You see that faith was active along with his works, and faith was completed by his works; and the Scripture was fulfilled that says, “Abraham believed God, and it was counted to him as righteousness”—and he was called a friend of God.”

    If we take this as I believe it is meant to be taken, our willingness to follow the law is evidence of our faith. If we claim to have faith, but make excuses when it comes to actually following the law, it is proof that we never had salvific faith.

    I think the problem that Christianity faces in the U.S. is that it is far too culturally convenient to claim Christianity. It means nothing to claim to be a Christian, because that’s the most practically advantageous route to take, especially in areas like the Bible belt. Too many people have faith that falls on stoney ground. Worse still, it’s become easy for them to rationalize away the withering of their false faith as you have described here.

    I honestly think that the direction the culture is taking with issues like gay marriage is a blessing in disguise. For too long American Christians have tried to make Biblical morality cultural morality. All we have ever really succeeded in doing is falsely calling cultural morality Biblical morality. I think it’s awful the emphasis evangelical Christianity puts on political action against gay marriage. Representatives of Christianity are going around trying to make practical, non-religious arguments for why we should legally force people into practicing beliefs they do not hold. Christianity is being represented by people who are trying to take God out of God’s law. This seems almost Satanic to me. When did any of the disciples ever go about trying to change pagan culture through non-religious political activism? If Christians want to change the culture they should make more Christians. Otherwise we are just spreading seed on stoney ground.

  3. Jayme says:


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s