Well, that’s not exactly what she said in the Neil Gorsuch hearing but it might as well have been. You see when questioning around the subject of abortion Feinstein said that she probably will oppose Gorsuch because he believes “the intentional taking of a human life by private persons is always wrong.”
Does anybody else see the absolute pure and unadulterated hypocrisy in that statement? Was it intentional, was it a Freudian/Feinstein slip or did her true color get exposed? You see, we actually do have laws on the books as it relates to the intentional taking of human life by a private person. And when you exclude the right for self defense, you are left with only one thing and we call it murder. Feinstein didn’t say that Gorsuch thought the taking of a mass of cells or a fetus was wrong, she referred to it as the “intentional taking of a human life” and according to our laws, that is always called murder. So wouldn’t that fall into the plus column for Gorsuch to always follow the law by seeing the intentional taking of a human life as always wrong?
These people who support the killing of babies are simply messed up in the head and it comes out in their inability to even get their terms and stories straight. So eat that cake up baby killers, but just know that it’s going to eat you up in the end. God will NOT be mocked!