Alabama has it right! We have already lost the abortion battle, which we may lose anyway, if we say murder is OK in some rare cases. It would be the equivalent of saying “well I guess you can murder that person because they had a poor or rough childhood and their quality of life going forward is, in my opinion, not worthy”. And there is where the problem comes in, “in my opinion” makes the killing about me and what I want or think and not about the decision to life being sacred to every single human baby, teen, adult or senior. We open ourselves up to the accusation that we are being inconsistent and hypocrites if we allow for exceptions of rape or incest and those accusations would be completely accurate. As Christians, sin is sin and the minute we start exceptions for sin is the very minute we lose the battle against evil. And just for the record, the church has and is already conceding “land for peace” with the secular society we find ourselves surrounded by in hopes of being seen as more compassionate or acceptable. This is so much a wrong, warped and short sighted focus as our holy Father in heaven is the only one we need to please. So I encourage all Christians to choose sides and choose a path and at the same time to be careful which one we choose. One of those paths leads nowhere good and we already know from scripture that most will take that much easier and broad path with lots of company. And although it is a much harder journey, I implore you to choose the very narrow pathway of real compassion which includes support for crisis pregnancies, housing pregnant teens, adoption and prayer. If you are truly “pro life” this is the only option that leads to true life, both on this earth for the not yet born and eternal life in heaven for those who choose that less traveled pathway.
Yielding is a good thing – most of the time. When you yield at a stop sign, when you yield while merging on the highway and when you yield to the Lord. The problem comes in when we start yielding to the pressures of the secular society surrounding us, and just so we are clear, our country has become a secular society regardless of what percentage “identify” as Christians. I think it will also help to distinguish between political pressures and moral ones. A lot of the political agendas out there are largely issues of preference, culture and changing tradition. For example the gun debate; there are many sides, persuasive points, social aspects, legal approaches and constitutional rights at play. But there is no clear biblical position on this issue other than the instruction to obey the laws once in place as long as they do not violate God’s laws. On the other side are moral issues, many of which have been inserted into the political arena, such as chastity, divorce, homosexuality, gender questions, abortion, gay marriage, pedophilia, pornography and the list goes on.
The church is being challenged to find that balance between yielding to God and trying to find that place of compromise with the rapidly changing society around us. Probably one of the first things to find some room for “compassion” was in the area of divorce. Yes, of course, there are scripturally legitimate reasons for divorce and I am not speaking about those. But somewhat like the rape/incest/life of the mother reasons for abortion (not biblical reasons by the way), the biblical allowances for divorce represent only a small percentage of divorces today. But in general, whereas divorce, any divorce, once garnered a societal negative stigma, we now have special Sunday school classes for those who have experienced divorce. Of course that, in and of itself, is not a bad thing. The sad thing is that these classes are often full to the brim of the hurting and wounded. And lest we forget, the reason God stopped listening to the petitions of the people in Malachi 2 was because of the high divorce rate. And this is where I, unfortunately, will likely lose many of you, whether divorce, chastity, homosexuality, abortion, pedophilia and all other biblically listed moral/sin issues, they are a package deal, bound together at their core and that core is yielding to the desires of the flesh. And it doesn’t matter which one raises its ugly head above the surface in a given situation, be assured ALL the rest of these abominations are hovering just below the surface exactly like the bulk of the iceberg hidden out of sight but one can be assured that it is there none the less. This is why scripture says “Whoever breaks one commandment is guilty of breaking them all” James 2:10
The journey down the sexually immoral “rabbit hole” is one single ever widening road with many on ramps and inter woven loops eventually encompassing any and all possible deviant concoctions. Fortunately there are also many off ramps as well for those who recognize their sin, repent and yield their hearts back to the narrow and hard to find pathway that leads to God. I, for one, still have to resist the temptation to get back on the pornography on ramp having exited it some years back. You see, I know where it can lead and there is nothing good or eternal down that road as it grows ever wider and wider to include more and more options. And so it is with the package deal. No, it is not clear how everything is connected at first and you may think you are just biding your time on your little corner of the ice. But hiding just beneath the surface of your particular “poison” are ever increasing and lethal traps from our enemy reaching up to grab you.
And just to be clear, the super highway of immorality is already flowing at breakneck speeds with some aspects already out in the public eye and others still very well hidden from view. Hollywood, proponents of progressive “right side of history” thought and “compassion/inclusion” advocates are systematically baby spoon feeding the church small morsels of compromise in areas in which we are expected to yield to social pressures so as not to be seen as narrow, rigid, uncompassionate and “old fashion”. Recently Lauren Daigle refused to identify homosexuality as a sin when asked point blank, saying “You know, I can’t honestly answer on that” adding that she has “too many people that I love” that “are homosexuals”. But the truth is the same today as it was in Hosea’s day (8:7) “When they sow the wind, they will reap a storm!” It is inescapable that when you grab any part of the tiger, you get the whole tiger. For example, we were once told that abortions would only be necessary, safe and rare. And now, with a newly proposed bill in Virginia, you can decide, POST LIVE BIRTH, if you want to allow your baby to live according to an interview with the VA governor,
Here is one of the authors talking about the bill. Be sure to notice it is even hard for her to bring herself to actually admit that abortion would be allowed till the very end.
Fortunately, due to huge backlash from the governor’s interview the bill was defeated yesterday in subcommittee in a 5-3 vote. Woe to those 3.
So you want sex outside of marriage or homosexuality? You WILL get pedophiles and the decriminalization of sex with children in the deal. You want feel good marriages with the option of no fault divorce? You WILL get affairs, pornography and all “shades” of deviance. You want to embrace same sex marriages? Every kind of gender confusion and corruption to include pre-pubescent boys being allowed to perform in gay sex clubs comes in the package (that has happened already FYI). You think “a little” pornography is OK? Porn is never static; it always spirals down into the ever increasing dark reaches of a hell which can never be satisfied. When you choose to compromise even the slightest of God’s moral decrees you cannot escape the harm, descent and consequences from breaking those laws anymore than you can defy the law of gravity. God commanded these laws, not to rob our fun, but to ensure the greatest joy within the boundaries of His moral laws.
We are certainly not supposed to sound off with arrogance, pride or an “in your face” manner our uncompromising standards, but our standards must nevertheless be just that, uncompromising, unmovable and scripturally based, God ordered standards from which we must not be moved. Will we be hated and ostracized for that? Yes, of course we will! But then that should come as no shock to those who read scripture as it clearly indicates that if we are not being loathed by the world then we must be doing something wrong.
The moral fiber of our country has been completely compromised and has crumbled to the ground. We live as God’s ambassadors and servants in a foreign and heathen land. Our job as God’s people is to dig through the rubble in search of those who would repent, be saved and join you on that narrow road that leads to life keeping in mind the sad truth of scripture that only a few will find that lightly traveled road. Matt. 7:14
“Gradually, though no one remembers how it happened, the unthinkable becomes tolerable, and then acceptable, and then legal and then applaudable!” – Joni Eareckson Tada
“If you believe what you like in the Gospel, and reject what you don’t like, it’s not the Gospel you believe, but yourself” – Saint Augustine
U2, a professed Catholic/Christian singing group from Ireland, launched their 2018 tour yesterday in Tulsa OK. Ironically, on the same day they announced their support for the repeal of Ireland’s 8th amendment which guarantees pre-born humans the right to life and prohibiting abortion on demand.
I will make this as short and un-sweet as possible. This is Satan at his sinister best to convince some supposed Christian band to launch their latest tour in the heart of the reddest of the red states (where, if put it to a vote of the people, abortion would lose soundly). Like so many others, they have surrendered to the god of this world by supporting the murder of the innocents.
And here is what appears to be the most ironically evil part of this whole thing is that they are calling their 2018 tour “Innocence Tour” and they announce that they support the the killing of the innocent on the same day they launch their tour of the same name.
Is there is a special place in hell for those who hurt or promote the hurting of the innocents? Scripture would suggest so and none of the guilty will escape and neither will U2. Will their influence tip the scales in Satan’s favor in Ireland’s vote? If so I am so afraid for them (U2) and the tremendous judgement it may bring.
- America is a Christian nation. There are still plenty of “die hards” out there still holding on to fantasy land. Contrary to wishful thinking, the moral high ground, once held by a more singularly focused majority of Christian/Catholic believers in America, has been ceded over to secular society and a cultural “Christian club” atmosphere significantly lacking in immovable and unchangeable standards. The unthinkable 50 years ago in terms of marital, moral and societal character has become tolerated if not boldly promoted in more and more denominations and churches across the breadth of this country. The mantra of being “on the right side of history” is being heard with increasing volume as the church attempts to “fit in” and be found relevant in the eyes of a society which has embraced a philosophy of “all of the above” when it comes to work and play. A humble attitude of servant hood, holiness and intercession is more imperative than ever in our role as “occupied” Christians.
- Divorce is not that big of a deal. This is a topic which, in most cases, requires one to change the entire focus and origin of marriage from being one of sacrifice, commitment and servant hood to a focus of selfishness and a “what makes me happy” attitude. Marriage was intended to be a picture of the unfailing commitment of God (the groom) to his people (the bride). So for the church to let this institution fall from its rightful position of highest importance and honor is deplorable. In fact, if any were wondering why answered prayer seems to be harder to come by these days one need only read Malachi 2:13-16 where God plainly states that our petitions and sacrifices are no longer acceptable because of the high divorce rate among His people. These verses should be an aha moment for the church but instead is perhaps our biggest area of denial. High divorce rates, which God clearly hates, are literally denuding the church of its effectiveness by surrendering this most important standard to the enemy.
- Pornography is primarily a problem among the un-churched. Patently FALSE! YOUR men sitting in YOUR pews in YOUR church are viewing pornography at alarming rates. All surveys indicate that pornography viewing among Christian men is on par and in some instances higher than that of their secular counterparts. Here are some statistics spanning 20 years. In 1996 an informal poll was conducted at a Promise Keepers conference which indicated that 1 in 3 of the attendees admitted to struggling with pornography. By 2009 a poll conducted by the Barna Group found 21% of Christian men saying they were fully addicted to porn and a staggering 64% saying that they viewed porn at least once a month. By 2014, just a short 5 years later, a new Barna poll saw that number had ballooned to as high as 79% among adult Christian males. This epidemic is also probably one of the single biggest contributing factors to denial #2.
Footnote: At a recent men’s meeting at our church only about 10% of the over 200 men present raised their hands when asked “who here feels comfortable praying with their wives”. Likely there is a direct and devastating relationship between that percentage and the percentage of those viewing porn since what guy is going to feel comfortable praying with someone they are being unfaithful too?
- Our Christian youth are remaining chaste. Again, patently FALSE! And again I’m talking about your youth in your church. Partly as a direct result of denials #2 & #3 with the added enticement of denial #5, our youth see little reason or import in purity and chastity and are in fact seduced in the opposite direction by media, movies and moral relevance. They have watched increasing numbers of grown adults, pastors or lay church workers getting caught up in divorce, adultery, affairs, pre-marital sex and pornography with little accompanying stigma, shunning or earthly consequences. As a result, they have grown to view participation in these areas as inevitable and the status-quo. What was once normal and healthy curiosity held back by well articulated and time honored standards of character and chivalry has morphed into rampant sexual experimentation run amuck as any consequences of sexual sin has been clouded as they witnessed the preceding generation’s promiscuity given a progressive wink and a nod. What has become accepted as normal in the church has little resemblance to biblical or traditional virtuous behavior. A study conducted by the National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy conducted in December 2009 indicated that 80% of evangelical youth had had sex compared to the only slightly higher 88% of secular youth of the same age. Young Christians simply do not understand or care “what’s the big deal” as the church has failed miserably in articulating to them the abundant blessings and benefits of sexual holiness nor the dangers, statistics of sadness, divorce rates and diseases related to rejecting God’s plan.
- With the things people wear now days, modesty is not that big of a deal. Historically, everyone would have agreed that men are stimulated visually. With what “passes” these days as modest one would think this well established fact had gone by the way side. I’m here to let you know that nothing has changed in the water as myself and all the guys I know are still very affected visually by form fitting, almost revealing and “cute is the new sexy” attire popular in today’s society. And, truth be told, this is a contributing factor in denials #3 and #4. In no way am I suggesting Burkas as the norm for Christians. But surely we can find some reasonable middle ground between the biblically described “bloomers” under full length robes, as instructed for those who minister before the Lord, and the almost nothing is too tight or revealing practice we see common today. One need only do a Google image search of “sexy jeans” to understand that the very popular leggings and skinny jeans are understood by society to be “sexy”. Is this what we want to be seeing, teaching (by practice or acceptance) and displaying as normal among Christians. I am suggesting that it should not be so. When almost nothing is left to the imagination, as if men needed help with their imaginations (again see denial #3), where else can you go. I do not believe I should have to put a guard over my eyes at church. I have to do this all day long out in “the world” and I think church, at a minimum, should be a safe place for me, my sons and the men around me (to a person, this is the opinion of almost every guy I have discussed this topic with). Men are drawn away because of their own lust and they can’t blame anybody else. My understanding of the “preferring my brother” concept in scripture has me, for example, forgoing alcohol around a brother for whom this has been a struggle in the past and see this principal as applicable in being considerate towards all with modest dress, especially the weaker brother. And with the porn viewing stats in denial #3 it’s clear the overwhelming majority of us are that weaker brother.
- Why all the fuss about homosexuality? Simply put because it is sin and it destroys lives. It is included in a long list of sins in Romans 1 including gossip, murder, envy etc. for which there is a punishment of death. Churches left and right are falling all over themselves to capitulate on this subject. The Pastor of Hillsong New York, Carl Lentz, recently said “we have a lot of men and women who are gay in our church and I pray we always do”. This was his way of avoiding taking a firm position on the acceptance of homosexuality after a couple of men in their choir (one on staff) announced they were getting married. Can you imagine substituting a different sin in that narrative such as “we have a lot of pedophiles in our church and I pray we always do”? That would be absurd (at least as of this writing). Homosexuality is an abomination in the eyes of God (no more or less than other sins) and even many in the gay community are skeptical about the goings on. The following article is a fascinating read. http://thefederalist.com/2016/05/16/loveless-narcissistic-sex-addicts-a-gay-man-critiques-his-community/
- The voice of the prophet is pretty much gone/ignored. That would depend on where you look and what kind of prophecy you are looking for. The last 3-4 decades has seen a different kind of prophet come on the scene. They tend to be more philosophical, political or personal in their target subject. I have no doubt that the Lord can use almost anyone to deliver His Word to His people. I fancy myself as having prophetic leanings but I am constantly reminded that a jackass did it once which hopefully keeps my errant ego in check. My personal take on the most common role of prophets (at least biblically) is one where the prophet indentifies areas of concern, gives a warning of impending consequences and offers steps of correction or repentance in order to prevent some or all of the fallout. Having witnessed numerous “personal prophecies” which have been delivered to others, and even myself, over the past half century, I have not always seen these types of prophecies producing enduring fruit or valuable direction. It certainly has happened, but it seems to be more the exception. Very recently some “prophets” identified a certain political candidate (now president) as “God’s man of the hour” – maybe, but also maybe not. The main thing I believe is lacking when it comes to prophecy and the prophet today is accountability. There were pretty severe consequences for false prophets in times past and I think many would think twice before opening their mouth if punishments were re-instated. I do believe there are countless prophets today calling for holiness, integrity and commitment – unfortunately fewer and fewer are listening.
- God’s message is one focusing only on mercy. This one is a “two sides of the same coin” issue or one of both/and. One of my main mentors when I was a young adult was Dr. Charles Farah of the theology dept. at ORU. He defined heresy as emphasizing one truth at the exclusion of another. This is exactly what is occurring with the plethora of “feel good” preachers pouring in over the horizon emphasizing all the blessings and none of the curses. The oft extravagant lifestyles and mansions combined with 6 & 7 figure incomes fly insultingly in the face of the lifestyle and message of the humble servant Jesus whom they claim to emulate. It is these same preachers who have been the quickest to capitulate on whatever is trending in society in order to maintain their popularity as their income and lifestyles depend on it. When a spiritual leader omits consequences or judgment from the narrative they likely do an eternal disservice to the hearer. This is unconscionable on the part of these self serving demagogues. The cost of discipleship is terminal as it brings us to the foot of the cross. It is at this beloved monument where true acceptance and riches are found as we follow Jesus, embrace holiness and find true joy in the knowledge that Jesus took our judgment on Himself.
- Love wins! This is actually not an area of denial as much as it is an area where wishful thinking is taking a front row seat. I’m referring to the very popular book of the same name (Love Wins) by Rob Bell. This is different than the preachers in denial #8 as Rob takes a more Universalist view of religion (I can’t bring myself to call it Christianity) in which any eternal consequences are non-existent, hell is not real and everyone will ultimately be “saved”. I can understand the immense popularity of this message especially for those with friends or relatives who have not accepted Jesus. The thought of some eternal physical punishment is not a happy one and to cast some spin on scripture which insures an eventual address in paradise is universally appealing. The knowledge that we serve a patient God who is not willing that any should perish but that all would come to repentance affords me the peace to leave ultimate judgment to His discretion. But lacking a Judeo/Christian basis for a Universalist/no hell scenario, I cannot be party to a message which, according to the scriptures we have, defrauds the hearer by giving some transitory peace of mind.
- The road to heaven is wide and easy to find. No we would never actually say this, but the growth of the “Club Christian” atmosphere in the world defies the fact that scripture actually says the opposite is true. And although somewhat related to denials #8 & 9, this is perhaps the most sobering point to ponder here. I have a love/hate relationship with the parable in Matt. 20 where the kingdom of heaven is described as being like a land owner who hires various groups throughout the day and then pays them all the same as if they had all work the entire day. I especially like to think of God that way as I might be one of the last hires and I want all He has for me. But then the prideful part of me sometimes feels like the one hired first with an inability to appreciate the last person getting the same as me. I am so very glad to leave in God’s hands justice, reward and judgment. At the same time, He did leave in our hands an abundance of scripture indicating there is both judgment and mercy. In fact, it gives me great pause to consider the full context of Matt. 7:13, 14 which plainly states that the road to destruction is broad and MOST will find it and the way is narrow and hard that leads to life and FEW will find it. God, be merciful to me a sinner and please help me find that most narrow of pathways that leads to life eternal!
- I’m sure these are issues in some churches, but not in mine. That is why I call this the top things many in the church are in denial about. Having been youth pastors for the better part of 15 years in churches that would be considered very conservative and evangelical I can tell you my biggest concern is for our youth. I say it that way because most all of the denials above which directly impact adults have devastating consequences on our youth. Parents and pastors easily notice or identify problems with other churches or other people’s kids but are often blind to that which is closest to them. I personally know several circumstances where cultural Christian young people are having sex while their parents, youth pastors or churches are clueless. And I use the term “cultural Christian” very intentionally as this is the best way to describe the children of God fearing parents for whom Christianity is seen as a social identity instead of a relationship with Christ with eternal ramifications. If you are in denial that these are issues in YOUR church, then this blog is ESPECIALLY for you!
I am not suggesting this is a complete list.
PS Abortion: Thankfully this is not a denial in most churches. But I am not sure all Christians understand the absolutely demonic nature of what has become such a norm in our society. It is only in modern day in which the murder of babies either in or outside the womb has become acceptable. It was only backward and barbaric nations which practiced the sacrifice of babies. It was only amongst the most heinous of civilizations in which to slice a baby out of its mother and cut into pieces in their dying presence was considered the ultimate insult. Here are some facts to have at your disposal if you encounter someone considering abortion and they have no “moral” reason not to.
- 31% of women having abortions report suffering physical health complications (1)
- 10% of women having abortions suffer immediate, potentially life-threatening complications (2, 3, 4)
- Women have a 65% higher risk of clinical depression following abortion vs. childbirth (5)
- 65% of women suffer symptoms of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) after abortion (1)
- Women’s death rates from various causes after abortion are 3.5 times higher than after giving birth (6, 7)
- Many women describe their experience as ‘a nightmare’, which can hardly be equated with ‘choice’. 60% of women surveyed after abortion responded that:’Part of me died’ (1)
- Suicide rates among women who have abortions are six times higher than those who give birth (7, 8)
- Abortion increases a woman’s risk of future miscarriages by 60% (9)
- Source: Rue et. al., “Induced abortion and traumatic stress: A preliminary comparison of American and Russian women,” Medical Science Monitor 10(10): SR5-16, 2004.
- Frank, et.al., “Induced Abortion Operations and Their Early Sequelae,” Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners 35(73):175-180, April 1985.
- Grimes and Cates, “Abortion: Methods and Complications”, in Human Reproduction, 2nd ed., 796-813.
- M.A. Freedman, “Comparison of complication rates in first trimester abortions performed by physician assistants and physicians,” Am. J. Public Health76(5):550-554, 1986).
- JR Cougle et. al., “Depression Associated With Abortion and Childbirth: A Long-Term Analysis of the NLSY Cohort,” Medical Science Monitor 9(4):CR105-112, 2003.
- M Gissler et. al., “Pregnancy Associated Deaths in Finland 1987-1994 — definition problems and benefits of record linkage,” Acta Obsetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 76:651-657, 1997.
- M. Gissler, “Injury deaths, suicides and homicides associated with pregnancy, Finland 1987-2000,” European J. Public Health 15(5):459-63, 2005.
- Gissler, Hemminki & Lonnqvist, “Suicides after pregnancy in Finland, 1987-94: register linkage study,” British Journal of Medicine 313:1431-4, 1996.
- N. Maconochie, P. Doyle, S. Prior, R. Simmons, “Risk factors for first trimester miscarriage—results from a UK-population-based case–control study,” BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Dec 2006.
Note: Studies 6, 7 and 8 looked at death rates for an average for up to one year after the end of the pregnancy. Another study found that looked at suicide rates for up to eight years found that, compared to women who gave birth, women who had abortions had a 62% higher risk of death from all causes and a 2.5 times higher suicide rate. Source: DC Reardon et. al., “Deaths Associated With Pregnancy Outcome: A Record Linkage Study of Low Income Women,” Southern Medical Journal 95(8):834-41, Aug. 2002.
Well, that’s not exactly what she said in the Neil Gorsuch hearing but it might as well have been. You see when questioning around the subject of abortion Feinstein said that she probably will oppose Gorsuch because he believes “the intentional taking of a human life by private persons is always wrong.”
Does anybody else see the absolute pure and unadulterated hypocrisy in that statement? Was it intentional, was it a Freudian/Feinstein slip or did her true color get exposed? You see, we actually do have laws on the books as it relates to the intentional taking of human life by a private person. And when you exclude the right for self defense, you are left with only one thing and we call it murder. Feinstein didn’t say that Gorsuch thought the taking of a mass of cells or a fetus was wrong, she referred to it as the “intentional taking of a human life” and according to our laws, that is always called murder. So wouldn’t that fall into the plus column for Gorsuch to always follow the law by seeing the intentional taking of a human life as always wrong?
These people who support the killing of babies are simply messed up in the head and it comes out in their inability to even get their terms and stories straight. So eat that cake up baby killers, but just know that it’s going to eat you up in the end. God will NOT be mocked!
Trump is not the kind of (read character/personality) president I would prefer. But then neither was Kennedy, Nixon, Bill Clinton or Hillary (if she had been elected). Personally, I think Ford, Carter, Reagan, the 2 Bush’s and to some extent even Obama conducted themselves with a demeanor that honors the office. I’m not sure I see that happening with Trump. He, unfortunately, is another in a category of what appears to be self serving, and, with Trump in particular, generally not presidential (my opinion). But alas all those mentioned before, and now Trump, were and are our (speaking of the citizens of US) president.
Was he (Trump) locker room boasting or has he actually grab women inappropriately? I don’t know and I suggest neither do you. To talk that way is wrong and insulting to women and to actually act out that way is criminal. I will tell you that I am VERY glad that hidden microphones were not around for some of the hurtful things I have said to Barbie and she feels the same way about some of the things she has said to me. We have truly done more damage to each other by some of our unrecorded words that anything I or Trump may have boasted about in the “locker room”. In fact as I have asked around, most admit that we are fortunate microphones were not hidden in various places for some of the worst things we have said. This in NO WAY excuses what I have said to Barbie or the demeaning way Trump spoke about women. But it is disingenuous for most of us to have some huge moral outrage at Trump while at the same time thanking our lucky stars under our breath that some of our “locker room” outbursts were never recorded. It is at this point I want to apologize to all women for any of the untoward things I have spoken in the past which were insulting towards women. I am glad there were not many, but I am guilty. I am far sorrier for how I have hurt my wife with my reactive or cutting words which actually did damage.
So I get it, Trump is not my kind of president either, but he IS my president. And I actually held my nose and voted for him as, given the candidates we were afforded, I was driven to a single issue and that was abortion. This single issue is defining and dividing our country more than race, gender questions or cake baking. It is an issue that gained significant traction out of the free love generation of the 60’s and the lack of wanting to take responsibility for what all that unaccountable sex produced. Just to be clear, this is a maturity and a responsibility issue not some benign choice issue. A majority of Americans oppose abortion on demand. Science has learned so much since the early 70’s to include the awareness of immense pain the not yet born baby can feel after just a few weeks of growth.
Consider this, we would all be outraged if somebody cut open a beautiful Labrador dog, pulled half a dozen puppies out and cut them into pieces. In fact that person would be arrested and prosecuted for animal cruelty and would likely spend time behind bars. But do the same thing in a PP office and a million people marching for women’s rights will cheer as if that act somehow preserved civility and rights. Or the fact that the majority of women who identified as pro-choice, once shown an actual video of a C&D or partial birth abortion change their position right then and there. My son Chad and I were discussing this subject this morning and he said that a nice white sanitary veil has been hung up to obscure the reality of what is actually happening behind the closed doors of abortion clinics and that people have bought into an idea of freedom, choice and rights that is actually anything but.
I had a close and long time friend write something on facebook this past week to the effect of “if my friends who voted for Trump don’t get it, then just listen”. So this past Saturday, my wife and I watched and listened to CNN and other mainstream media outlets as the “march for women’s rights” events were televised. Maybe it is just us “stupid rural” folks, but to watch Ashley Judd’s rant or Elisabeth Warren describe the things she wants to fight Trump about was to end up very confused. I will just put Ashley Judd aside as I don’t even know what to say about her, but I did not hear very much of what Elisabeth Warren was fighting for that Trump would disagree with or that Trump has not already joined in the fight for. In addition to listening, we also watched. And what we saw confused us even more. For a crowd that was (in truth) protesting Trump’s disgusting antics as much or more than they were advocating women’s rights, we were frankly disgusted by many of the vile signs, costumes and gestures. Remind me – what was this march about??? We saw signs covering the gamut of subjects, most of which had little or nothing to do with women’s rights.
Now top all that off with the fact that if you were a Trump supporter or a pro-life woman, your rights were not to be included or protected in this “noble” cause. In fact, you were not welcomed and if you did show up you were threatened and actually chased from the parade route.
So after actually listening and watching Barbie and I did in fact learn a few things. We learned that well over 50% of the women in America were simply “not welcomed” to this party supposedly promoting all women’s rights. We learned that Ashley Judd is just plain crazy. We learned that many people are, justifiably, upset about Trump’s foul mouth and perhaps actions and are willing to get out and march about it. We learned that the “everyone is welcomed to join” does not actually mean everyone. We learned that if Trump voices support for something it is ignored but if Elisabeth Warren is for the same exact thing everyone cheers. We learned that Madonna wants to “blow up the White House”. We agree that it’s wrong for Trump to say disgusting things but don’t understand why countless people wearing vagina costumes out in public is somehow ok. We learned that an anti-Jewish and anti-Israel Palestinian woman was one of the main organizers of the march which doesn’t sound very inclusive.
Most of these fears being expressed appear to be red herrings to me. I haven’t heard Trump or anybody he has appointed wanting to invalidate gay marriages, destroy the arts (although in my opinion government has no business spending tax dollars there but that is not an attack on the arts), undo LGBTQ rights or in any way destroy education (although this should only be handled at the state level in my opinion). And even though Trump would be called a climate denier, to a person, everyone he has appointed who has been asked in the vetting hearings, agrees that climate change is real. I have not seen any suggestion or indication that any US citizen might be marginalized because of race, gender or religion in fact, Trump has a better record of equal pay in his businesses than Hillary did among her own staff.
Bottom line, listening should be a 2-way experience. But we have learned that it is not always that way. We also leaned that to be included, welcomed or not ignored means something very different with those who lean left than those of us who lean further to the right. It is normally portrayed that the left is the inclusive and non judgmental crowd but this past weekend would suggest the opposite is actually true.
I am seeing more and more post expressing shock and “oh my gosh” outrage over all the things being revealed about corruption in politics, the media, Trump, Hillary, Bill and almost anyone connected to them.
All I have to say is REALLY!!! Seriously, please quit with all the hyped/fake shock and outrage!
Where has everybody been for the last quarter century? Nothing that has happened here has any shock value to it for me. I wrote a book which covers some of these types of trends that I started almost 20 years ago and I blog about this stuff all the time. Anyone who is shocked is either being disingenuous or has spent the last 25 years at Disney World where every bit of dirt or trash is swept up before you have a chance to see it.
Don’t get me wrong, I am disappointed, disgusted, nauseated and saddened by all the lack of integrity and character. But shock? No, not shocked, as I am well aware of the depravity of our society that little would shock me at this point.
There are also choruses of people advocating a no vote or a vote for a third party and you are absolutely free to make that decision. But it might be important history for younger people to be aware of (because it was before your time or while you were still in grade school) that in 1992 we had a viable 3rd party candidate, Ross Perot, who garnered almost 20% of the popular vote in that national election in an effort to make inroads into challenging the corrupt 2 party system – and yes, I agree that it is corrupt. He made a notable showing, but that 20% of the vote is the very thing that ushered the Clinton’s into power. They may not be the most corrupt dynasty we have had (although I suspect they might be), but they are the current one. For 25 years we have been living with the severe consequences which occurred as a result of all those who either by a no vote or a vote for Ross Perot enabling the current levels of corruption we have.
I cannot and will not excuse or defend the corrupt or lewd actions of either candidate or party but neither am I shocked by them. But there is still something that I will be shocked by until the day I die and that is the fact that as a “civilized” society we still allow the mutilation and murder of babies who have either not yet been born or who are in the process of being born.
Perhaps the only thing I have to hope for in this current election season, (and I say hope because in life there are no guarantees) is that several of the honorable pro-life people on the list of 20 candidates for the Supreme Court which Trump has released as being his choices will have a chance to be appointed. The Democrats are afraid of this list and even Hillary acknowledged in this last debate that Trump will put people into the Supreme Court who can overturn Roe V Wade. All you have to do is take note that this issue (Supreme Court Nominees) is of one of the most frequently mentioned platform positions the Democratic party mentions about Trump when arguing against him being elected.
There may be no way to properly express the incredible importance of this power which will be placed into the hands of the next president which will have massive affect on certain aspects of the direction our nation takes over the next generation.
I also understand that some may want to distance themselves from this election and be able to say “I sure didn’t vote for him/her”. The reality is that we live in a secular and frankly evil and corrupt nation and unless you are going to remove yourself entirely from ever participating in the election process, you will most likely be voting for someone who represents very little of your values in the majority of future elections. As Christians there is little we can do beyond prayer, but I believe we must do what we can when there is a window of opportunity to help defend the most defenseless in our midst.
And who knows, Trump could drop dead the day after the election and Mike Pence could become president – hey, it could happen.